Aragonite based ground covering

ABSTRACT

Compositions and methods in which aragonite, and especially oolitic aragonite particles are used as infill material in an artificial turf structure or as sub-growth substrate for natural grass. Advantageously, oolitic aragonite particles provide a superior microporous surface for effective water saturation to impart thermal control and environmental compatibility, ammonia neutralization of urine by reducing urea hydrolysis with the free calcium presented in the aragonite particles, aragonite particle uniformity allowing for reduced compaction and desirable water draining, and the microporous oolitic aragonite particles have an evaporative cooling surface.

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 17/098,097, filed Nov. 13, 2020, and U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 17/229,733, filed Apr. 13, 2021, which claimspriority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.62/948,746 filed on Dec. 16, 2019, the entire contents of which areincorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure relates to compositions, systems, and methods ofuse of aragonite, and especially oolitic aragonite as infill materialfor artificial grass/turf, and/or as sub-growth substrate for naturalgrass.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The background description includes information that may be useful inunderstanding the present disclosure. It is not an admission that any ofthe information provided herein is prior art or relevant to thepresently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically orimplicitly referenced is prior art.

All publications and patent applications herein are incorporated byreference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patentapplication were specifically and individually indicated to beincorporated by reference. Where a definition or use of a term in anincorporated reference is inconsistent or contrary to the definition ofthat term provided herein, the definition of that term provided hereinapplies and the definition of that term in the reference does not apply.

Artificial turf has become an increasingly attractive solution for manyvenues to reduce water consumption, enhance durability, and improveresistance to pet waste. Moreover, in dry conditions, artificial turfprovides an ‘evergreen’ grass-like ground cover. However, mixedartificial grass materials and/or relatively long artificial grassblades require infill materials to stabilize the blades in asubstantially natural looking manner and to prevent matting. To thatend, several different infills are currently known in the art.

For example, crumb rubber can be used as a filler and is typicallyproduced from recycled tires and so contains a number of knowncarcinogens. Moreover, due to its black color, the filler material willbe very hot when exposed to the sun. Additionally, known rubber-basedinfill has no significant ammonia neutralization capabilities. Crumbrubber can be coated to render the product more acceptable as described,for example, in EP 1416009 and US 2005/0003193. However, even withcoating, numerous undesirable problems remain—in particular, theundesirable heating and the inability to neutralize ammonia from sourcessuch as urine. Still further, crumb rubber has been suspected to leachtoxic chemicals into waterways posing a risk to the environment,animals, and humans.

To avoid potential difficulties with environmental toxicity, silica sandcan be used as infill material. Most silica sand is rough and angular inshape, resulting in compaction under pressure, which ultimately willcompromise drainage capability. Moreover, most silica sand fillers areprone to dust formation upon installation and use, which may lead tosilicosis. In addition, silica sand is known to heat up to undesirablyhigh temperatures under sun exposure. While ceramic materials have beenused instead of silica sand as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,818,274,dust formation is still problematic, and neither silica sand norceramics have ammonia neutralization capabilities.

Alternatively, various organic materials can be used to circumventissues associated with dust formation. For example, WO2008/115085discloses composite filler materials comprising coconut shell, maturedcoconut husk, young coconut shell, young coconut husk, Manila hemp,lignin and cassava. Such materials may further be coated withantimicrobial agents as described in US 2010/0055461. Unfortunately,even with a coating, nut-based fillers may trigger allergic reactionsand are still prone to dust formation.

Temperature control of infill materials can be attempted withwater-filled superabsorbent materials such as polyacrylamide orpolyacrylate as described in US 2006/0172092. Unfortunately, thesematerials are typically mechanically unstable and require replacement orrefill. Alternatively, hollow cylindrical infill material has been usedas described in US 2009/0286017, but these materials are typicallysubject to compaction over time. Still other polymeric fillers areshaped as hollow spheres to provide shock absorption as disclosed in US2011/0135851. While such materials avoid at least some of the problemsnoted above, most or all of them still lack environmental compatibilityand ammonia neutralization capabilities. As such, compaction, properdisposal, and/or pet waste remain significant issues.

Thus, even though various infill materials for artificial turf are knownin the art, all or almost all of them suffer from various disadvantages.Consequently, there is a need to provide improved compositions andmethods for infill materials for artificial turf which are at leastenvironmentally friendly infill materials that resist compaction,provide desirable thermal control, and enable ammonia neutralization.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The inventors have now discovered that aragonite, and especiallymicroporous oolitic aragonite can be used as an infill material forartificial turf that is environmentally friendly, resists compaction,provides desirable thermal control, and enables ammonia neutralization.Moreover, as oolitic aragonite is relatively heavy, it will weigh downartificial grass effectively. Moreover, and as is shown in more detailbelow, the inventors have observed that oolitic aragonite isapproximately 20 degrees Fahrenheit cooler than typical infill materialand advantageously provides ammonia neutralization properties withouttoxicity or dusting.

The inventors contemplate a groundcover that comprises a plurality ofturf fibers coupled to a backing to form an artificial turf structure,and microporous oolitic aragonite particles disposed between the turffibers. Most preferably, the aragonite particles comprise ooliticaragonite, which may be processed to a desired size or size rage (e.g.,micronized oolitic aragonite). Thus, in some embodiments the aragoniteparticles may have an average size of less than 1 mm, or may have anaverage size of between 250 micrometer and 500 micrometer. It is furthergenerally preferred that the aragonite particles will have a surfacearea of at least 0.9 m²/g, or at least 1.2 m²/g, or at least 1.5 m²/g.Additionally, the microporous oolitic aragonite particles have auniformity constant of between about 1.2 to about 1.8.

Additionally, the at least some of the aragonite particles may becolored and/or comprise an antimicrobial agent (e.g., via coating orimpregnation). Further contemplated aragonite particles comprise wateror are even water saturated (particularly to control temperature).Therefore, in other embodiments the backing may have drainage holes orcomprises a water permeable material.

Consequently, the inventors also contemplate a method of reducingtemperature excursions of an artificial turf structure that includes thesteps of providing an artificial turf structure that comprises aplurality of turf fibers coupled to a backing, and at least partiallyfilling a space between the turf fibers with a plurality of aragoniteparticles to thereby reduce temperature excursions as compared to theartificial turf structure with a silica filler. For example, suchmethods may reduce the temperature excursion by at least 10, or at least20° F.

Similarly, the inventors contemplate a method of neutralizing ammoniafrom urine in an artificial turf structure that includes a step ofproviding an artificial turf structure that comprises a plurality ofturf fibers coupled to a backing, and another step of at least partiallyfilling a space between the turf fibers with a plurality of microporousoolitic aragonite particles, where advantageously, the microporousoolitic aragonite particles provide reactive calcium to thereby suppressammonia volatilization from urea hydrolysis.

Viewed from yet another perspective, the inventors also contemplate amethod of reducing compaction, wrinkling, or matting of an artificialturf structure that includes a step of providing an artificial turfstructure that comprises a plurality of turf fibers coupled to abacking, and another step of at least partially filling a space betweenthe turf fibers with a plurality of aragonite particles to therebyreduce compaction or matting as compared to the artificial turfstructure with a silica filler. For reduced compaction, in someembodiments, the microporous oolitic aragonite particles have auniformity constant of between about 1.2 to about 1.8. Preferably, themicroporous oolitic aragonite particles have a uniformity constant ofbetween about 1.4 to 1.6.

In yet a further aspect of the inventive subject matter, the inventorsalso contemplate a method of enhancing water drainage of an artificialturf structure that includes a step of providing an artificial turfstructure that comprises a plurality of turf fibers coupled to abacking, and another step of at least partially filling a space betweenthe turf fibers with a plurality of oolitic aragonite particles tothereby enhance water drainage as compared to the artificial turfstructure with a silica filler. In some embodiments, the enhanceddrainage includes an artificial turf made with a plurality ofmicroporous oolitic aragonite particles having an aeration porosity ofbetween about 15% to about 30% at depth of about 6 inches to about 8inches, and/or a saturation constant (K_(sat)) of at least 50 in/hr.

In at least some embodiments of contemplated methods, it is preferredthat the aragonite particles are contacted or even saturated with water.Moreover, and most typically, the aragonite particles comprise ooliticaragonite, which may be micronized to a desired size. For example,suitable microporous oolitic aragonite particles may have an averagesize of between 250 micrometer and 500 micrometer. Furthermore,contemplated microporous oolitic aragonite particles may have a surfacearea of at least 0.9 m²/g, or at least 1.2 m²/g, or 1.5 m²/g.Additionally or alternatively, the microporous oolitic aragoniteparticles have a uniformity constant of between about 1.2 to about 1.8,and a saturation constant (K_(sat)) of at least 50 in/hr.

In still another contemplated aspect of the inventive subject matter,the inventors contemplate a method of building a natural grass landscapethat includes a step of providing or laying down a sub-growth substratefor natural grass that comprises a plurality of aragonite particles, anda further step of depositing and/or growing turf or topsoil with grassseed onto the sub-growth substrate. Where desired, drainage conduits maybe installed within the sub-growth substrate to assist proper drainage.

Various objects, features, aspects, and advantages will become moreapparent from the following detailed description of preferredembodiments, along with the accompanying drawing in which like numeralsrepresent like components.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 depicts a photograph and an exemplary SEM image of ooliticaragonite.

FIG. 2 depicts exemplary results for particle size and shape analysis ofoolitic aragonite used herein.

FIG. 3 depicts exemplary results for selected physical properties ofoolitic aragonite used herein.

FIG. 4 depicts exemplary simulated aeration and capillary results ofoolitic aragonite used herein.

FIG. 5 depicts exemplary results of the amount of ammonium (NH4+) inparts per million (PPM) measured over 7 hours (420 minutes) at indicatedtimepoints in artificial turf compositions made with no infill,aragonite infill as disclosed herein, Envirofill®, Zeoderizer, OlivePits, and Silica Sand, as indicated.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The inventors have now discovered that aragonite, and particularlyoolitic aragonite will provide numerous benefits over conventionalfiller materials when used in ground covers. Most significantly, ooliticaragonite provided superior drainability, cooling (via reflectivity andwater evaporation properties), dimensional stability in a layer (asoolitic aragonite will not significantly compact), and ammonianeutralization capabilities (which is especially desirable where pet orother animal waste is present).

While not limiting to a particular theory or hypothesis, the inventorscontemplate that these and other advantages of oolitic aragonite are atleast in part attributable to the unique character of aragonite. Morespecifically, oolitic aragonite is typically spherical and highlymicroporous, thus endowing exceptional drainage capabilities to thematerial. In addition, oolitic aragonite also has an extremely highsurface area of about 1.7 m²/g (125,000 in²/in³), which means themaximum area to promote the neutralizing of ammonia and cooling effect.

Moreover, it should be appreciated that aragonite is not only anon-toxic natural product, but is also a sustainable resource. Ooliticaragonite is generated through the chemical fixation of Carbon Dioxide(CO₂) to the naturally present Calcium (Ca²⁺) in the ocean's water,which results in the precipitation of Calcium Carbonate (CaCO₃). Thisprocess is fueled by the photosynthesis within the blooms ofphytoplankton; picoplankton: specifically cyanobacteria and unicellulargreen algae as they drift across the warm water banks of the Bahamas.Cyanobacteria have a Carbon Dioxide Concentrating Mechanism (CCM) thatraises the concentration of CO₂ at the site of the carboxylating enzymeribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RUBISCO) by up to 1,000 times thesurrounding medium. In addition, cyanobacteria excrete organic polymericsubstances to form extracellular formations. These ExopolymericSubstances (EPS) serve as a nucleation surface for mineralization,accelerating the calcium carbonate generation process. The combinationof the CCM and the presence of the EPS within the surrounding medium ofthe warm shallow waters of the Bahamas which are already supersaturatedwith the element Ca²⁺ and carbonate anions (Ca⁺⁺ concentrations are atover 10 millimolar) readily result in the phenomenon of “Whitings”,cloudy precipitation of oolitic aragonite (CaCO₃) with a unique crystalmorphology. This process continually produces millions of tons per yearof oolitic aragonite within the Bahamas. FIG. 1 is an exemplaryphotograph of the macroscopic appearance of oolitic aragonite, andfurther shows a SEM image of the crystalline morphology at highmagnification.

In one exemplary contemplated use where aragonite is employed as aninfill for artificial turf, oolitic aragonite is dried and screened to aconsistent gradation of 10 mesh to +30 or +40 mesh. The so obtainedaragonite is then combined with artificial and turf grass to provideweight, to keep the synthetic grass fibers upright, to provide coolingproperties and ammonia neutralization capabilities. While ooliticaragonite is typically used as described above, the aragonite can befurther processed prior to use. Among other processes, aragonite may bereduced in size (e.g., micronized an average particle size of less than1 mm, or equal or less than 500 micrometer, or equal or less than 300micrometer, or equal or less than 100 micrometer, or equal or less than50 micrometer, or equal or less than 25 micrometer), colored with one ormore dyes or pigments, coated or otherwise treated with antimicrobialagents and/or scented agents, or impregnated or coated with one or moreagriculturally relevant agents or chemicals (e.g., fungicide,insecticide, herbicide, fertilizer, etc.). Still further contemplatedmodifications include restructuring of aragonite as is described in WO2020/150274 (U.S. 62/792,735), which is incorporated by referenceherein. Likewise, the aragonite may also be reduced in size whileretaining its oolitic shape, typically using a ball mill process. Thus,suitable milled aragonite may include oolitic aragonite having anaverage particle size of between 5-20 micrometer, or between 20-50micrometer, or between 50-200 micrometer, or between 200-500 micrometer,or between 500-700 micrometer. NMOtably, such micronized particles willstill retain the benefits as noted herein and described in more detailbelow.

With respect to the cooling effect of oolitic aragonite it should beappreciated that the microporosity present in the ooids (each particlegrain) will help trap water, which in turn acts like suspended waterdroplets with very high surface area, creating mini-natural airconditioning cooling units as wind passes over or through them.Moreover, the color of oolitic aragonite is close to white, resulting ina highly reflective surface while scattering light multi-directionallydue to the crystalline morphology of the aragonite surface crystals ascan be seen in FIG. 1 . Notably, milling oolitic aragonite will producean even whiter product as compared to raw oolitic aragonite. Preliminarytests of milled aragonite as an infill with artificial grass have shownthat the temperature of the so filled artificial grass was approximately20 degrees Fahrenheit cooler than standard infill based on silica sand.Typically, the temperature excursion of the ground cover made ofartificial turf and microporous oolitic aragonite particles uponexposure to sun is 20 degrees cooler than artificial turf with silicasand or without infill. For example, the temperature excursion of theground cover made of artificial turf and microporous oolitic aragoniteparticles is about 10 to 20 degrees (F.) cooler. More typically, thetemperature excursion of the ground cover made of artificial turf andmicroporous oolitic aragonite particles is 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,17, 18, 19, or 20 degrees F. cooler than a ground cover made with thesame artificial turf without infill or made with silica sand.

Notably, the total porosity of the microporous oolitic aragoniteparticles is desirable. Typically, aeration porosity is made up ofrelatively large pores that conduct water under saturated conditions.When drained, they are filled with air, providing the oxygen that isnecessary for root growth. The capillary porosity is made up of smallpores that hold water against the force of gravity, retaining much of itfor plant use. Ideally, a root zone mix would contain a nearly equaldistribution of air and water filled pore space after free drainage. Intypical embodiments, the aeration porosity of the microporous ooliticaragonite particles is of between about 15% to about 30%. For example,the aeration porosity of the microporous oolitic particles is about 15%,20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, or 30%.

In addition, it should be noted that oolitic aragonite andmicronized/milled oolitic aragonite had also a remarkable dimensionalstability. Indeed, the oolitic aragonite particles and themicronized/milled oolitic aragonite particles had a uniformitycoefficient (Cu) of about 1.51, which is typically regarded a uniformlygraded sand that contains particles of the same size and hence morevolume of voids. Typically, the disclosed oolitic aragonite particles(e.g., micronize/milled oolitic aragonite particles) have a Cu that doesnot exceed 1.8. For example, the the oolitic aragonite particles have aCu of or between about 1.2 to about 1.8. More typically, the ooliticaragaonite particles have a Cu that does not exceed 1.6. For example,the oolitic aragonite particles have a Cu of or between about 1.2 toabout 1.6. Most typically, the oolitic aragonite particles have a Cu ofor between about 1.2, 1.25, 1.3, 1.35, 1.4, 1.41, 1.42, 1.43, 1.44,1.45, 1.46, 1.47, 1.48, 1.49, 1.5, 1.51, 1.52, 1.53, 1.54, 1.55, 1.56,1.57, 1.58, 1.59, 1.6, 1.65, 1.70, 1.75, or 1.80. Preferably, theoolitic aragonite particles have a Cu of or between about 1.4 to about1.55. Most preferably, the oolitic aragonite particles have a Cu of1.45, 1.46, 1.47, 1.48, 1.49, 1.5, 1.51, 1.52, 1.53, 1.54, or 1.55. Theuniformity of the oolitic aragonite particles results not only insignificantly reduced compaction or even no measurable compaction, butalso in very high hydraulic conductivity (water movement) through alayer formed by the aragonite. In other words, aragonite ooids aregenerally smooth and round in structure, unlike the angular and roughsurface of silica sand. The desirable uniformity coefficient (Cu) ofaragonite allows for a maximum number of particles of the same sizewhich together with the increased volume of voids between the particles(which are substantial factors in both drainage and compaction), thedisclosed oolitic aragonite does not compact under pressure like angularsands (silica). Indeed, the saturation constant (K_(sat)) of ooliticaragonite was measured to be at least 50 inches per hour (in/hr),indicating excellent drainage capabilities. Preferably, the K_(sat) ofthe oolitic aragonite particles (e.g., micronized/milled ooliticaragonite particles) is about 45, about 46, about 47, about 48, about49, about 50, about 51, about 52, about 53, about 54, about 55, about56, about 57, about 58, about 59, about 60, about 61, about 62, about63, about 64, about 65, about 66, about 67, about 68, about 69, or about70 in/hr. More preferably, the K_(sat) of the oolitic aragoniteparticles is of from about 50 in/hr to about 60 in/hr. For example, theK_(sat) of the oolitic aragonite particles is about 50, 51, 52, 53, 54,55, 56, 57, 58, 59, or 60 in/hr.

Moreover, the inventors discovered that oolitic aragonite also providedexcellent neutralization of ammonia smell, typically due todecomposition of urea found in human, livestock, and pet urine. Urinecommonly has a pH of 4.8 to 8.0 and contains urea (CO(NH₂)₂). Hydrolysisof urea results in the formation of ammonia and ammonium molecules,causing the undesirable urine smell. Oolitic aragonite has high levelsof exchangeable calcium (Ca²⁺), which can offset the pH increase causedby urea hydrolysis and as such prevents or reduces the volatilization ofthe ammonia molecules. As such, artificial turf and lawn products withoolitic aragonite infill will not only have a higher durability andresist wrinkling and matting, but also reduce or even entirely preventmalodors due to animal urine decomposition.

Additionally, the inventors also contemplate reduction of ureavolatilization losses via application of oolitic aragonite at the timeof fertilizer application. Here, all top-dressed ammonia- andammonium-based nitrogen (N) fertilizers can volatilize. The greatestpotential to volatilize lies with urea and fluids containing urea suchas urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN; 28-0-0 or 32-0-0). This volatilizationcan result in extra expenses due to lost fertilizer, insufficientfertilizer application resulting in lower yields, and on a larger scaleincreased industrial nitrogen fixation which has global implications forthe environment. Any technology that has the potential to reduce theamount of volatilization losses represents a potential benefit tofarmers and the environment in general.

More specifically, urea is hydrolyzed by reacting with water and a H⁺ion, leading to the production of two molecules of ammonium and a singlebicarbonate ion. Ammonium exists in equilibrium with ammonia that isdirectly related to the pH of the solution. Low pH favors ammonium andhigh pH favors ammonia which is available for volatilization. Notably,the pH of the solution is raised by the adsorption of the H⁺ ion duringurea hydration. The increase in soil pH can result in NH₃ volatilizationfrom soils with an initial pH as low as 6.5. Soils with high CationExchange Capacity often have high levels of exchangeable calcium (Ca²⁺),which can offset the pH increase caused by urea hydrolysis as shown inthe equation below.CO(NH₂)₂+Ca²⁺−soil+2H₂O↔2NH₄ ⁺−soil+CaCO₃

Unlike typical urea hydrolysis, when it occurs in the presence of freeCa²⁺, it does not use H⁺ and thus does not raise pH as long as there issufficient exchangeable Ca in the system. Not only does it minimize thepH increase, but it also opens two sites on clay particles for NH₄ ⁺ tobind to, further decreasing NH₄ ⁺ in solution and the potential for NH₃(g) volatilization. Addition of oolitic aragonite to this process willprovide the free calcium ions that will be required for the abovereaction. It may also push the equilibrium of the reaction to the leftthus reducing the potential for volatilization by reducing thehydrolysis of urea itself. Therefore, when oolitic aragonite is used ina material subject to urine contact (e.g., artificial turf, bedding inchicken houses, diapers, playground sand, etc.) the effluent ammonia issignificantly reduced.

In view of the above the inventors also contemplate use of aragonite ina sub-growth substrate for natural grass where a base layer of (milled)oolitic aragonite is employed as a drainage layer as well as a retentionlayer for fertilizer. As such, the aragonite layer will maintain ahigher pH without the constant addition of chemicals. Indeed, aragoniteholds the highest pH of any gravel or sand and has up to 30 times thebuffering capacity of Dolomite, Calcite, or Oyster shell. In addition,and unlike commonly known substrates, aragonite will not require anyreplacement, buffering the soil for the life of placement. Moreover, asdisclosed herein, the K_(sat) values for hydraulic conductivity wereabove 50 in/hr, indicating excellent drainage capabilities. Stillfurther, it should be noted that the oolitic aragonite can be readilyspread in most mechanical spreaders due to both the uniformity in sizeand quick moisture conductivity.

Aragonite can also act as a high capacity bio-filter. Aragonite isextremely porous, with about 20,000 square inches of surface area percubic inch. This is why aragonite also has significant capability inreducing nitrates, nitrites, and ammonia, allowing a bio-load many timesgreater than other substrates. Finally, aragonite has also a highadsorption capability. There are three main parameters that define theadsorptive capacity of oolitic aragonite. These are (1) solubility andbuffering capacity, (2) zeta potential (surface charge), and (3) surfacearea and void ratio.

Examples

Oolitic aragonite was analyzed for particle size distribution andparticle shape, and exemplary results are provided in FIG. 2 . As can bereadily seen, the material was very uniform in particle size, with mostof the particles falling into the medium size fraction. The uniformityof the particle size is illustrated by the uniformity coefficient (Cu).Indeed, the aragonite material had a particle size distribution that wassubstantially more uniform than typical other silica based materials.Moreover, the particle shape was determined to be mostly rounded.Selected physical properties of the aragonite sample, as determined oncompacted cores, are shown in FIG. 3 .

The total porosity was desirable in the sample. Typically, aerationporosity is made up of relatively large pores that conduct water undersaturated conditions. When drained, they are filled with air, providingthe oxygen that is necessary for root growth. The capillary porosity ismade up of small pores that hold water against the force of gravity,retaining much of it for plant use. Ideally, a root zone mix wouldcontain a nearly equal distribution of air and water filled pore spaceafter free drainage.

The inventors performed a water release curve on the sand sample. In asand or sand based mix profile, the deeper the profile depth the greaterthe aeration porosity will be because of a greater hydraulic head orpressure. The inventors applied increasing levels of energy to thesample to extract water from it, simulating varying depths of sand. Bydoing this, the inventors can identify a minimum plating depth that willprovide desirable physical properties. The inventors identified thisminimum depth by the point (depth) at which the inventors obtained aminimum aeration porosity of 15% by volume with an optimum being thepoint where the aeration and capillary porosity curves intersect. Thegraph in FIG. 4 shows the aeration and capillary porosity values atdifferent simulated depths. As can be clearly seen, the sample had anaeration porosity of 15% at a depth of about 6 inches with an optimumdepth of 8 inches. Plating the sand at a depth less than the minimumwould run the risk of the sand retaining too much water at the expenseof air.

With reference to the graph in FIG. 5 , neutralization of ammonia wasassayed using artificial turf with aragonite infill compared to noinfill and other infill products. As indicated in FIG. 5 , the testedproducts were: (1) Baseline—No infill; (2) Calcean (2 lbs/sf), Aragonite10×30 mesh product; (3) Envirofill® (2 lbs/sf)—16×30 mesh acrylic coatedsand; (4) Zeoderizer—(2 lbs/sf); (5) Olives (1.5 lbs/sf)—Grinded olivepits; and (6) Silica Sand—(2 lbs/sf). The collected information wasqualified by measuring the amount of ammonium (NH₄) in ppm present inthe ambient environment above the artificial turf after each of theartificial turf samples were injected with coyote urine. Morespecifically, 2.5 lbs of the indicated infill (or no infill forBaseline) was added to each 12″×12″ piece of artificial turf. The infillwas spread over the respective turf piece and allowed to settle. Eachartificial turf piece with infill was dosed with 20 ml of coyote urinewith each turf being placed under a fume hood. The ammonia meter waspositioned 12″ above the test turf, and readings were collected everyhour for 7 hours (420 minutes). Readings were also taken at 24 hours asnecessary to determine when the ammonia had stabilized within thesample.

As shown in FIG. 5 , the artificial turf with the aragonite infill wascapable of neutralizing the ammonia at a faster rate compared to theartificial turf with no infill, the Envirofill®, the (4) Zeoderizerinfill, the Olive pits infill, and the Silica Sand infill.

Materials/Equipment Used: Laboratory fume hood, Ammonia Meter (FD ModelNH3000), Stand for Meter, Artificial Turf, Infill Material, CoyoteUrine, 10 cc syringe,

The recitation of ranges of values herein is merely intended to serve asa shorthand method of referring individually to each separate valuefalling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, eachindividual value is incorporated into the specification as if it wereindividually recited herein. All methods described herein can beperformed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein orotherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and allexamples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided with respectto certain embodiments herein is intended merely to better illuminatethe full scope of the present disclosure, and does not pose a limitationon the scope of the invention otherwise claimed. No language in thespecification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed elementessential to the practice of the claimed invention.

It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that many moremodifications besides those already described are possible withoutdeparting from the full scope of the concepts disclosed herein. Thedisclosed subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except inthe scope of the appended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both thespecification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in thebroadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, theterms “comprises” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring toelements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicatingthat the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, orutilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that arenot expressly referenced. Where the specification claims refers to atleast one of something selected from the group consisting of A, B, C . .. and N, the text should be interpreted as requiring only one elementfrom the group, not A plus N, or B plus N, etc.

What is claimed is:
 1. A synthetic ground cover, comprising: a plurality of synthetic turf fibers coupled to a backing to form synthetic artificial turf structure; aragonite particles disposed proximate to the synthetic turf fibers; and wherein the aragonite particles are microporous oolitic aragonite particles having a evaporative cooling surface.
 2. The ground cover of claim 1, wherein the aragonite particles comprise dredged, not mined, micronized oolitic aragonite.
 3. The ground cover of claim 1, wherein the aragonite particles have an average size of less than 1 mm.
 4. The ground cover of claim 1, wherein the aragonite particles have a surface area of at least 1.5 m²/g.
 5. The ground cover of claim 1, wherein at least some of the aragonite particles are colored and/or comprise an antimicrobial agent.
 6. The ground cover of claim 1, wherein the aragonite particles have a saturation constant (K_(sat)) of at least 50 in/hr.
 7. The ground cover of claim 1, wherein the ground cover has an aeration porosity of between about 15% to about 30% at depth of about 6 inches to about 8 inches.
 8. A method of cooling a synthetic artificial turf structure, comprising: providing an artificial turf structure that comprises a plurality of synthetic turf fibers coupled to a backing; disposing a plurality of microporous oolitic aragonite particles proximate to the synthetic turf fibers; and wherein the aragonite particles are dredged, not mined, and have water evaporation properties to cool the artificial turf structure.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the temperature of the artificial turf structure is reduced by about 10° F. up to about 20° F. as compared to the silica filler.
 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the aragonite particles have a saturation constant (K_(sat)) of at least 50 in/hr.
 11. The method of claim 8, wherein the aragonite particles have a high microporosity, caused by the unique crystalline morphology (orthorhombic), and high surface area, approximately 1.82 square meters per gram, both of which aid in trapping moisture internally and allowing evaporative cooling within the particles thus by the nature of the aragonite's infill between the blades of synthetic turf the aragonite lowers the artificial synthetic turf temperature.
 12. The method of claim 8, wherein the aragonite particles are classified and or micronized particles having a uniform graded sizing between 150 microns and 850 microns with a uniform ooid shape thus stacking within the artificial synthetic turf in a manner which helps to disperse impact energy in a manner which aids in the reduction of sports injury, as in scrapes and bruises.
 13. A synthetic ground cover, comprising: dredged, not milled, minerals from living organisms; and a plurality of synthetic turf fibers coupled to a backing to form synthetic artificial turf structure; wherein the dredged minerals are disposed proximate to the synthetic turf fibers.
 14. The synthetic ground cover of claim 13, wherein the minerals comprise CaCO₃.
 15. The synthetic ground cover of claim 13, wherein the minerals comprise aragonite.
 16. The synthetic ground cover of claim 13, wherein the minerals are microporous having a surface that traps moisture.
 17. The synthetic ground cover of claim 16, wherein the trapped moisture evaporatively cools the synthetic groundcover.
 18. The synthetic ground cover of claim 16, wherein the temperature of the artificial turf structure is reduced by about 10° F.
 19. The synthetic ground cover of claim 16, wherein the temperature of the artificial turf structure is reduced by about 20° F. as compared to the silica filler.
 20. The synthetic ground cover of claim 13, wherein the minerals particles have a saturation constant (K_(sat)) of at least 50 in/hr. 